Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Will you or anyone else spare me the search how these tags should be added?
I've looked
for lame, but I didn't see it listed.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2008 at 4:22
I looked at how foobar2000 does it, and it just puts something like "1/13",
"2/13",
and so on in the TRCK field. The media players I use (including RockBox,
Rhythmbox,
mplayer, etc) handle this fine.
Original comment by iain.dal...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2008 at 7:53
Note, that's for id3 tags only. Vorbis tags (used if FLAC, too) do it
differently,
they have a TRACKNUMBER field and a TOTALTRACKS field.
Original comment by iain.dal...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2008 at 7:55
I've marked issue 208 as an duplicate.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2008 at 5:17
Vorbis Comments do not define a standard "Total number of tracks" tag. It all
depends on the player. I think the best way would be to have "TRACKTOTAL"
instead of
"TOTALTRACKS". To me, it makes more sense to use TRACKTOTAL as it matches
TRACKNUMBER more than TOTALTRACKS does. The same goes for the number of discs
in an
album. "DISCTOTAL" makes more sense than "TOTALDISCS". When you look at all the
tags
in a file in alphabetical order, the disc tags would be together as well as the
track-related tags. EasyTag seems to be one of the most popular and complete
metadata editors for Linux and it uses the naming scheme I mentioned. Also,
Foobar2000 can easily be configured to use separate tracknumber and tracktotal
tags.
It would also be nice if we could choose the tags we wanted to use via a
configuration file. This would allow everyone to be happy as you could choose
to use
any method for a "total number of tracks" tag ("TRACKNUMBER=01/13",
"TOTALTRACKS",
or "TRACKTOTAL").
Original comment by jckenn...@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2008 at 4:00
Fixed in r277. The disctotal metadata tag will be implemented when issue 154
will be
solved. Currently the info is not available yet.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2008 at 12:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
iain.dal...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2008 at 6:12