Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Should it really be made optional? Can't we use it as default value?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2008 at 9:20
Well. People might have different reasons for different values. Some might like
high
priority and some low. Anyway it wouldn't be your fault if somebody chose a
stupid
value (the option could also be marked 'advanced' with a warning).
Personally I would pass a value for piority slightly below normal to all
encoders,
maybe even lower... a value in the range 6 to 12 maybe.
Original comment by Xeno...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2008 at 3:36
I do want to protect some users from making stupid choices ;) Encoding processes
having lower priority should never result in a breaked encoding. On the other
hand
some people might notice a more responsive desktop at a small encoding time
cost. I
see no problems.
From a usability perspective it's not always good to offer more options. I'd
like to
keep rubyripper a lean app and to be usefull with the default values. Too much
options only works confusing for most users.
So prepending "nice -n 6" to the encoding command would do the trick, right?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2008 at 8:05
I see your point... :)
Well, if you want to hardcode it I think that (-n 6) would be a sane value.
And people might be a little more happy as their webbrowsing might be a tad
more
fluent while ripping CDs...
Original comment by Xeno...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2008 at 8:37
Fixed with commit 30cec02.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 1 Nov 2008 at 12:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Xeno...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2008 at 4:54