Closed Avamander closed 7 years ago
I asked for review by sgerli and frostyfrog. @HenryDelMal needs to give consent explicitly as he's not a member, I think.
I agree. The license seems to be the proper.
Now we are just waiting for @frostyfrog 's approval.
By using the license one can still use proprietary software to interface with the API as the data generated by it is not under the license (only this code is). Mainly this license disallows anyone to use this specific API code without stating changes and disclosing source (assuming it has been modified). The license does not disallow commercial use.
Consent of all three contributors, @frostyfrog, @HenryDelMal and @sGerli is needed. (Github's review feature could be used too to give consent)