Closed matthew-england-unsw closed 2 years ago
I performed a few more diagnostics on the sea ice, and I've found a lag between the two runs, specially at the beginning:
I then plot the sea-ice of the first month average and this difference seems to be everywhere. I'm wondering if the restart is correctly imported for the first leg of the run...
This is just an issue with the time variable on the sea ice diagnostics. Copy the example sea ice notebook here closely and the problem goes away. See PR here.
Thanks Adele, all good
Would be good to look at sea ice extent changes, so we can compare to obs. Is the Weddell change in extent as extreme as the change in volume?
@pedrocol Where are you getting the 60 months of sea ice data from? When I use: start_time='2150-01-01' end_time='2155-01-01' session_name = '/g/data/e14/pc5520/model_data/access-om2/basal_melt_MOM5/basal_melt_MOM5.db' basal_melt_session = cc.database.create_session(session_name)
aice_Tfreezing_min =getACCESSdata(var='aice_m',start=start_time,end=end_time,exp=Tfreezing_min,freq='1 monthly',ses=basal_melt_session, minlon=geolon_t.xt_ocean.values.min(),maxlon=geolon_t.xt_ocean.values.max()) print(aice_Tfreezing_min.shape)
I get only 24 months ... ?
Also only 24 months of sea_ice data when running your code from here: https://github.com/pedrocol/basal_mom5-collaborative-project/blob/main/notebooks/seaice/seaice.ipynb
What experiment are you loading Paul? I think only GPC006 has 5 years. If it’s not in that database you could try the other database I linked to earlier (in the example notebook also I think).
Sorry Paul, I made a mistake when setting the simulations parameters so I had to rename them, here is the up to date list of simulations
oh great ... thought i had some (more) marbles :)
p
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:42 AM Pedro @.***> wrote:
Sorry Paul, I made a mistake when setting the simulations parameters so I had to rename them, here is the up to date list of simulations
[image: Screenshot from 2022-09-07 19-40-10] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23285319/188995935-2ee438e2-e869-4f83-8105-41bb58a59af3.png
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pedrocol/basal_mom5-collaborative-project/issues/9#issuecomment-1239980306, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSWJXACFDFSDFRKPKW5DOLV5EK3RANCNFSM543NAXUA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
-- I’m sending this message at a time that suits me. I don’t expect you to reply outside of your own work hours.
Paul Spence, Assoc. Prof. ARC Future Fellow Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies https://www.imas.utas.edu.au/ University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia https://paulspence.github.io/
I performed a 1 year simulation with calving = 0.5 runoff and no basal melt. Below the plot of the sea ice volume time series. I confirm that the increase of the sea ice we have seen comes from the reduction of the runoff
Sea ice concentration anomalies ... less in Amundsen more in Ross ... kinda same response as meltwater increase here: https://github.com/adele157/IAF-meltwater/issues/7#issuecomment-1218875096
Minor changes in sea ice area:
Total and Anomaly for all Antarctic:
Sea Ice Area anomalies:
SIA anoms are quite small - note Amundsen is only area with a decrease in SIA.
Bigger changes in sea ice volume (since thickness is less a slave to the atmosphere):
Total and Anomaly for all Antarctic:
SIV anomalies:
Switch to basal melt scheme seems to muck with the seasonal cycle a bit.
Sea Ice Thickness:
Sea Ice Growth via Frazil and Congel anomalies in Tfreezing_min:
Growth vars don;t really show why we get so much more ice in the Weddell Sea. Convergence or less summer melt? Unfortunately the dvidtt and dvidtd vars aren;t available.
Closing, this uses the old simulations. New sea ice issue here.
Check 'em out