It gets checked against rejected emotes/names with reasons. Fail = deny
⤷ for example if the problem is specifically the name/image combo'd together, then an emote with just said name or image can get through, but not something with the same
⤷ if the reason is just the name (e.g. slurs, bigotry, etc), and the created emote uses that name, it gets denied (same sort of thing for image contents)
Using the same system that we end up using for step 3 in #14, I would like to have an option for someone to be able to upload their art, and instead of having it become a public emote, it gets added to the database of image contents that get auto-rejected.
That would give artists the option to for example stop others from uploading your sub emotes. However I think we would need to require a reason that we review before it gets blocked, to avoid abuse/misuse. The reason would need to be proof that you are the original artist/own the rights to it, and reserve the right to keep it private. Also it would be good to give them the option to enable it as an emote if they change their mind about it.
Using the same system that we end up using for step 3 in #14, I would like to have an option for someone to be able to upload their art, and instead of having it become a public emote, it gets added to the database of image contents that get auto-rejected.
That would give artists the option to for example stop others from uploading your sub emotes. However I think we would need to require a reason that we review before it gets blocked, to avoid abuse/misuse. The reason would need to be proof that you are the original artist/own the rights to it, and reserve the right to keep it private. Also it would be good to give them the option to enable it as an emote if they change their mind about it.