Fight the model jungle

[jhnns]

The control flow of saving, fetching and destroying models is currently a total mess. Also the model is getting bigger and bigger. We need to split tasks and rework it.

First sketch

Explanations:

• read/readCollection/create/update/destroy are called io-event/methods
• later there may be createCollection/updateCollection/destroyCollection for better io performance

  Model

The model represents a collection of attributes that can be watched and changed. Thus the model can also be used to save specific states in views (without being something that must be serialized).

• provides setters and getters for attributes
• is able to revert uncommited changes
• doesn't know about model urls and ids
• unaware of the environment (works exactly the same on the client and on the server)
• fires change-events
• it should also be possible to listen on specific attribute changes (like on("change:myName", ...)

  Resource

The resource is divided in a static- and instance-part.

Resource (static)

• represents a specific type of data that can be serialized
• thus we need an url that identifies the type over the network
• the static Resource is able to validate a serialization of a resource instance
• provides methods like find() and findById()
• knows how to translate a resource instance back and forth into a JSON representation

  Resource (instance)

extends Model

• represents a bunch of actual data that can be saved, fetched and destroyed
• thus the resource should be able to provide a resource url that identifies an instance of the resource uniquely
• to create that url the instance needs a collection of all related ids
• an instance is basically a model with additional methods like save(), fetch(), destroy() and validate()
• the JSON presentation should contain all data and information to identify and process the resource
• on save/fetch/destroy it just emits the related io-event on the api

  Api (singleton)

extends EventEmitter

• an io-event can be understood as a request to do read/write with a resource's serialization
• informs its listeners when someone requested to read/readCollection/create/update/destroy/validate an instance of a specific resource. Therefore it passes the serialization of the instance, not the instance itself to its listeners
• an io-request may contain any arbitrary data (e.g. for authorization)
• thus an http/websocket request just emits a specific event that a resource's serialization should be stored persistently

  Service (singleton)

The service is responsible to read or write resources into a persistent data storage.

• provides io-methods for serializations of resources
• therefore it needs the ids and attributes (and maybe params)
• listens typically on the Api for io-events of a specific resource and reacts

  Example

// services/post/CommentService.server.class.js

var CommentService = Service.extend("CommentService", {

    read: function (req, res) { ... },

    readCollection: function (req, res) { ... },

    create: function (req, res) { ... },

    update: function (req, res) { ... },

    destroy: function (req, res) { ... }

});

// registers listeners for io-events of that url on the api
CommentService.watch("blog/comment");

// remove listeners
CommentService.unwatch();

// client.init.js

// watch on Api for specific requests and start a http/websocket request
RemoteService.watch("blog/comment");

Questions

• is the resourceCache (former modelCache) part of the static Resource or is it a special service? If it's a service, the resourceCache needs the instance, not its serialization
• who is responsible for creating instances of resources? There is also the tricky part with sub resources
• how does validation work?
• are there server/client schemas and how do they work?
• what happens on changes of the ids?

[meaku]

Seems like a lot of stuff to me :)

[jhnns]

It also seems useful to separate between raw data and a model instance. Sometimes it's more desireable to work on the raw data (especially if you don't need an EventEmitter or convenient methods like save(), fetch() or destroy().

One possible solution could be that the Resource will always emit and accept raw data in contrast to the Model. But the Resource provides a special link method to register a specific Modelclass for a model url and extends that Modelclass with convenient-methods like find, save, fetch, etc.

BlogResource.link(Blog);

// calls internally something like
Blog.find = function (ids, params, callback) {
    var req = new Request(ids, params),
        res = new Response();

    BlogResource.emit("readCollection", req, res);

    return res;
};
Blog.prototype.save = function () {
    var method = this.getId()? "create" : "update",
        req = new Request(this.getIds(), null, this.toObject()),
        res = new Response();

    BlogResource.emit(method, req, res);

    return res;
};
// and so on