Closed taqtiqa-mark closed 5 months ago
The following sentence has been add to illustrate the difference to the original Schwartz and Smith's model:
In the original Schwartz-Smith model, the parameter $\gamma$ is set to zero. However, in our extended model, we introduce the flexibility for this mean-reversion parameter associated with the long-term factor to take on non-zero values.
And you claim this is still arbitrage free?
If so, please cite the proof.
Please see: https://github.com/peilun-he/PDSim/commit/635cf312bbe0f438b33007af33a3b972ebadfce1.
4 papers were added as reference. This arbitrage-free pricing (with $\gamma \ne 0$) has been using by some other authors in different futures (Sørensen, 2002) or in crude oil futures but different number of factors (Ames et al., 2020; Cortazar et al., 2019; Cortazar & Naranjo 2006).
Please see: 635cf31.
4 papers were added as reference. This arbitrage-free pricing (with γ≠0) has been using by some other authors in different futures (Sørensen, 2002) or in crude oil futures but different number of factors (Ames et al., 2020; Cortazar et al., 2019; Cortazar & Naranjo 2006).
In light of those references, you need to clarify your following claim, which could be read as an assertion of priority:
... in our extended model, we introduce the flexibility for this mean-reversion parameter associated with the long-term factor to take on non-zero values.
Specifically, Isn't this the FP model? Please clarify who introduced the general model, and if different, who provides the no-arbitrage proof for the unrestricted specification?
Yes you are right. This is futures pricing model, and it was used for options in commodity markets. The best reference would be:
Cortazar, G., Millard, C., Ortega, H., & Schwartz, E. S. (2019). Commodity price forecasts, futures prices, and pricing models. Management Science, 65(9), 4141-4155.
Eduardo Schwartz is the co-author of this paper, and not only that, this paper provides a framework with N factors, all of them being OU processes, hence $\gamma_i \ne 0, i = 1, \dots, N$ in general. I will revise my comment of the reference in the paper based on your feedback.
The Schwartz-Smith model is:
The current project implements a subtly different specification:
The difference should be addressed.