hello:
I have read your paper carefully and I'm confused about the receptive fields corresponding to res-50 calculated in your paper. I have calculated it by myself, the results are 35, 99, 291, corresponding to res2, res3, res4, different from the results in your paper. Could you tell me the details about this calculation process??
Thank you !!
hello: I have read your paper carefully and I'm confused about the receptive fields corresponding to res-50 calculated in your paper. I have calculated it by myself, the results are 35, 99, 291, corresponding to res2, res3, res4, different from the results in your paper. Could you tell me the details about this calculation process?? Thank you !!