Closed Fonotec closed 4 years ago
Hi @Fonotec , I cannot access the directory you list. Can you please place this snapshot somewhere else?
Hi @pelahi, I place the snapshot in the directory /cosma6/data/dp004/dc-nobe1
together with the cfg file, can you access the file now?
Hi @Fonotec , I don't have access to /cosma6/
. I do have access to /cosma7/data/dp004/
Hi @pelahi, I put the files in /cosma7/data/dp004/dc-nobe1
.
Seems that the input files had starts dithered at different position.
Yes, agreed. That's fixed on our side.
For runs I did with a fork of swift, the COLIBRE fork I have been running some boxes. In these boxes I form stars and I can see the stars if I look at the snapshot with for example gadgetviewer I see that there are stars that are in the halos. However when I run VR on the snapshot it does halo finding and that seems to work (like the HMF is correct), but when I start to look at properties related to stars it seems to produce results that do not make sense, stellar masses way too low etc. I expect to get a similar result as compared to the other boxes with the swift main code.
Physical the simulation is very similar to the EAGLE XL runs done by other people I only use a different fork of SWIFT and I have some additional extra arrays in the hdf5 file for the gas particles. The snapshot can be found on cosma in directory
/cosma6/data/dp004/dc-nobe1/swift-colibre/examples/EAGLE_ICs/EAGLE_25_NOAGN_exp
, I run VR on eagle_0036.hdf5 in this folder using thevrconfig_3dfof_subhalos_SO_hydro.cfg
file (not on the fly). I also tried running without substructure finding but also in this case the result seem to be similar in terms of not getting good stellar masses.I guess there is a subtle thing going on, I checked the units between the fields in the snapshots and that seem to be the same as in the main swift code, so I do not know what is happening.