Closed kjs73 closed 8 years ago
are we happy with this, can we merge?
Should be fine now. Confirm with @js850
I looked it over a while ago and it seemed OK. I didn't have any major issues, but I didn't look that closely. As Julian mentioned, implementing it as a flag rather than a new class might have been preferable, but it's not a big deal.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 at 14:24 Julian Schrenk notifications@github.com wrote:
Should be fine now. Confirm with @js850 https://github.com/js850
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pele-python/mcpele/pull/74#issuecomment-182395517.
I agree, it has been changed to a flag now. What do you think?
looks good to me
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 at 13:52 Julian Schrenk notifications@github.com wrote:
I agree, it has been changed to a flag now. What do you think?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pele-python/mcpele/pull/74#issuecomment-185211969.
If If an optimizer is passed to g(r), this will quench the snapshot of coords before accumulating the distances to the g(r) histogram. This is intended to give the quenched g(r) mentioned here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.449840