Closed dianashk closed 8 years ago
Related issues filed:
Chelsea, NY Soho, NY
Crown Heights, NY
not clear what's happening since the record from WOF is in the index as can be seen here however search doesn't surface it. Popularity is set to
1
so maybe it's just not able to score high enough to surface above the other results.
✘ regression [10] "{"text":"chelsea, new york"}": score 1 out of 2
diff:
label
expected: Chelsea, New York County, NY, USA
actual: Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
✘ regression [11] "{"text":"soho, new york"}": score 3 out of 4
diff:
label
expected: Soho, New York County, NY, USA
actual: Soho, Brooklyn, NY, USA
✘ regression [1425586777012:3] "{"text":"paris"}": score 1 out of 2
diff:
label
expected: Paris, France
actual: Paris, Paris-4E-Arrondissement, France
✘ regression [1425586777012:6] "{"text":"london"}": score 3 out of 6
diff:
label
expected: London, Greater London, United Kingdom
actual: London, City of Westminster, United Kingdom
label
expected: London, Middlesex, Canada
actual: London, City of Westminster, United Kingdom
label
expected: London, United Kingdom
actual: London, City of Westminster, United Kingdom
✘ regression [5] "{"text":"san francisco"}": score 2 out of 3
diff:
region
expected: California
actual: Atlántida
✘ regression [1] "{"layers":"coarse","text":"chelsea"}": score 3 out of 4
diff:
label
expected: Chelsea, New York County, NY, USA
actual: Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
✘ regression [3] "{"layers":"coarse","text":"ridgewood"}": score 3 out of 4
diff:
label
expected: Ridgewood, Queens County, NY, USA
actual: Ridgewood, Bergen County, NJ, USA
✘ regression [1-1] "{"layers":"coarse","text":"chelsea, ny"}": score 1 out of 2
diff:
label
expected: Chelsea, New York County, NY, USA
actual: Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
✘ regression [3-1] "{"layers":"coarse","text":"ridgewood, ny"}": score 1 out of 2
diff:
label
expected: Ridgewood, Queens County, NY, USA
actual: Ridgewood, Bergen County, NJ, USA
✘ regression [12] "{"text":"New Zealand"}": score 1 out of 2
diff:
label
expected: New Zealand
actual: New Zealand, Kaikoura District
✘ regression [2] "{"text":"new york"}": score 2 out of 4
diff:
label
expected: New York, NY, USA
actual: New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA
label
expected: New York City, Manhattan, NY, USA
actual: New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA
✘ regression [3] "{"text":"london"}": score 2 out of 4
diff:
label
expected: London, Greater London, United Kingdom
actual: London, City of Westminster, United Kingdom
label
expected: London, Middlesex, Canada
actual: London, City of Westminster, United Kingdom
✘ regression [5] "{"point.lat":51.515049,"point.lon":-0.093229}": score 2 out of 3
diff:
region
expected: London
actual: City and County of the City of London
✘ regression [7] "{"text":"mission, ca","layers":"coarse"}": score 7 out of 8
diff:
priorityThresh is 5 but found at position 7
✘ regression [3] "{"text":"450 w 37th st, new york, ny 11232"}": score 13 out of 14
diff:
unexpected result found
Aggregate test results
Pass: 146
Fail: 23
Placeholders: 0
Regressions: 15
Took 78292ms
Test success rate 92%
Ok, we're now down to just a few tests failing. They roughly fall into 3 categories, with a few other misc. failures
san francisco, ca
450 w 37th st, new york, ny 11232
This one tests that if we specify a brooklyn address with zip code, that an address which is identical except for zip code, and is in Manhattan, does not appear. Needs some more investigation, and we should probably fix it since the bad result is first. Tracked in pelias/api#456mission, ca
does not return the mission district high enough. I believe this is a bad test since there are many places in CA called mission. I've proposed a new test, which we pass, in #20149 Kay Street
returns unexpected result 49 De Kay Street
Ideally address matching would not return streets that are similar but clearly wrong, so we should investigate why this result is showing up now. But this seems like another we could wait on fixing (correct results are still first)
Aggregate test results Pass: 129 Fail: 24 Placeholders: 0 Regressions: 25 Took 81119ms Test success rate 86%