rdfs:label, rdfs:comment, skos:altLabel in documentation

dlindem commented 2 years ago

Is there a way to tell ontoology that it should list the values for these three properties in the documentation? For terms, we have lots of multilingual labels, and for classes/props, we also have labels and defs.

skos:definition values are listed; rdfs:comment are not. Should I use the former also for props and classes instead of the latter, so that the value appears in the documentation, or can ontoology be set to consider also rdfs:comment?

pennyl67 commented 2 years ago

I can see rdfs:comment displayed with ontoology for the MS documentation (e.g. http://www.meta-share.org/ontologies/meta-share/meta-share-ontology.owl/documentation/index-en.html#/LexicalConceptualResource) so the fact they're not display be be due to another reason.

gkirtzou commented 2 years ago

I only see one rdfs:comment declared in the ttl file that generated the documentation (in lexmeta:wikibaseEntity) and it does not appear, though I cannot understand why. Given Widoco documentation (https://dgarijo.github.io/Widoco/doc/bestPractices/index-en.html#desc-term) one can use

for the label : rdfs:label, skos:prefLabel or obo:IAO_0000118
for term definition : rdfs:comment or skos:definition

skos:altLabel are probably not used from this tool for the documentation. As far as the multilingualism, widoco has a configuration to set the language, and I have set it to en, so probably only keep the information in that language, I am not sure. I could try to add some of the other availables languages and see what is being generated.

pennyl67 / LexMeta

rdfs:label, rdfs:comment, skos:altLabel in documentation #13