Open pennyl67 opened 2 years ago
I think before deciding which ones to narrow for our purposes, we should have in the ttl file the domain and range of the properties as in the original schema. For instance, bibo:cites has as domain and range bibo:Document (see https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/bibo/bibo/bibo.rdf.xml) and not frbr:Manifestation as in our current LexMeta ttl file. If this cannot be done automatically from wiki, I can find a way of getting this from the original vocabularies, but we'll need to see how to feed in wiki.
We have now frbr:Manifestation
and ms:DatasetDistribution
both described as subClassOf bibo:Document
, being ms:DatasetDistribution
also subClassOf frbr:Manifestation
.
bibo property bibo:cites
has bibo:Document
as range.
There are properties that have as domain and/or range a broad class (e.g. schema:bookEdition has domain frbr:Endeavour) and others with a narrower (e.g. ms:resourceName with ms:LexicalConceptualResource). What's the rationale behind this?