search

pennyphp / discussion

Only issue about the future
0 stars 0 forks source link

Demo applications / Classic App #3

Closed fntlnz closed 9 years ago

fntlnz commented 9 years ago

At the moment when we do a BC in penny (like #102) we have to update multiple repositiories (bookshelf, classic-app) we should consider having just one "skeleton-application" somehow complete.

Currently bookshelf is using twig + doctrine + symfony forms and other goodies.

What do you think?

samsonasik commented 9 years ago

classic-app for skeleton-application is ok for me, bookshelf is rather more complex case sample

fntlnz commented 9 years ago

Ok so we may rename classic app to something like skeleton-app ? What do you think about having doctrine in skeleton app?

samsonasik commented 9 years ago

for naming, classic-app is still ok for me, i think the skeleton should be as slim as possible without db anymore. iirc, like symfony did, probably one more repo for "demo app" will be cool, but bookshelf already demoing it, right?

gianarb commented 9 years ago

In my opinion penny-classic-app, bookshelf and for example twitter-uservice https://github.com/gianarb/twitter-uservice

are only different implementation of penny.. Are 3 app.. :) We maintain classic-app and bookshelf because we are interesting to update them..

if penny-classic-app is not a good name we can change the name and we can try to design an OFFICIAL skeleton app that implements a set of libraries that we decide here.. :)

fntlnz commented 9 years ago

Yes you got the point. What could be a good name for the classic app? Skeleton application? Base application?

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015, 19:09 Gianluca Arbezzano notifications@github.com wrote:

In my opinion penny-classic-app, bookshelf and for example twitter-uservice https://github.com/gianarb/twitter-uservice

are only different implementation of penny.. Are 3 app.. :) We maintain classic-app and bookshelf because we are interesting to update them..

if penny-classic-app is not a good name we can change the name and we can try to design an OFFICIAL skeleton app that implements a set of libraries that we decide here.. :)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pennyphp/discussion/issues/3#issuecomment-152605246.

fntlnz commented 9 years ago

Ok I just don't like the classic app name :D and I don't like plates as default templating engine btw On Oct 30, 2015 18:44, "Abdul Malik Ikhsan" notifications@github.com wrote:

for naming, classic-app is still ok for me, i think the skeleton should be as slim as possible without db anymore. iirc, like symfony did, probably one more repo for "demo app" will be cool, but bookshelf already demoing it, right?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pennyphp/discussion/issues/3#issuecomment-152598765.

gianarb commented 9 years ago

np I change it in skeleton-app

samsonasik commented 9 years ago

penny- prefix will be better, so penny-skeleton-app :)

gianarb commented 9 years ago

ok :)

fntlnz commented 9 years ago

:+1:

gianarb commented 9 years ago

Done. We start another issue into the correct repo to choose the best components for our skeleton app :)

Thanks!