Closed stolarczyk closed 3 years ago
I actually don't mind it the way it is, since that's the old behavior.
what's the CWL plugin's version? {sample.name}_cwl.yaml ?
what's the CWL plugin's version? {sample.name}_cwl.yaml ?
yes
I think I'd leave it, on the grounds of backwards compatibility. but if you want to change it I guess I'm ok with it.
following the conclusions in #307, I'll change the defaults to make names consistent:
what about the project-included variant of the basic function? should that be a parameter instead of a separate function? if separate, it should have a separate output.
Oh yeah I forgot about this one. It's a separate plugin now. So it should have a separate output and separate key to parametrize it.
Currently our plugins produce files with the following default names:
looper.write_sample_yaml
: {sample.name}.yamllooper.write_submission_yaml
: {sample.name}_submission.yamlshould we change the first one to {sample.name}_sample.yaml to make the naming convention consistent?