search

peppolautoriteit-nl / Invoice-Processes-Draft

Draft documents regarding invoice to payment processes, and which documents to send in which scenario
0 stars 8 forks source link

Registration of ID for MLR with differend SP's for C2 and C3 #6

Closed wimkok closed 2 years ago

wimkok commented 3 years ago

Problem at MLR about the registration of a message for the C2. Now this runs through the ID of C1 but this ID may already be in use as C4 and managed by C3. Now we are thinking of registering C2 for MLR messages.

PatrickVHL commented 2 years ago

We have agreed within the NPa Technical Workgroup to use the identifier of C1 / C4 for routing the MLR. This implementation is more in line with the implementation for other messages. Also it makes it clear who is the actual enduser that has sent the original document (and in some cases must be informed about the error). From a basic reporting perspective, the registration of MLR with an enduser schemeID gives better insight in the actual senders that are connected to Peppol.

wimkok commented 2 years ago

This can give problems as indicated in https://github.com/peppolautoriteit-nl/Invoice-Processes-Draft/issues/8 . This issue can be considered as the same issue.