search

pepsighan / ruukh-ui

An experimental next-gen frontend framework for the Web in Rust.
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

Html text without the need of literal strings #16

Open pepsighan opened 6 years ago

pepsighan commented 6 years ago

html! macro uses literal strings to define texts which is quite cumbersome.

html! {
  "Hello World!"
}

It would be HTML like if we could lift this requirement. 

html! {
  Hello World!
}

But to implement that we need to get location info from Spans of proc-macro2 which is under procmacro2_semver_exempt. So, we'll need to wait on that for the time being.

davidhewitt commented 6 years ago

Mmm I have been playing with web-sys too, trying to build something similar to Ruukh :). I ended up writing a parser for html in nom, which works quite well except I can see it's not going to parse rust code inside { }'s very easily...

I wonder if we make some noise in https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/issues/406 whether there's much hope on that becoming stable

pepsighan commented 6 years ago

@davidhewitt Yeah, plugging nom with syn is going to be difficult and also preserving Span information is of utmost importance so that we can report errors. syn is not the one to stabilize line informations, I think it's proc-macro2.

limira commented 6 years ago

Hi @csharad, I don't know how feasible to implement this in your project. I tried this with my own project, but finally I prefer strings in "..." than not. There are only two more characters to type, and also you don't have to invest your time trying to implement it. My reason is that in a large code in html!{...}, if you put strings in "...", with the help of the editor highlighting, they stand out clearly. It helps to distinct/spot out items more easily. Without the "...", editors highlight them as identifiers, punct... which they are not, make it hard for to find out things we want.

davidhewitt commented 6 years ago

@limira while I definitely see the benefits of the approach you've taken in Simi, my own preference is to have a syntax as close to HTML as possible. Though I concede that to support nice highlighting inside the html! macro will then need extra editor grammar added, I think sticking to HTML syntax gives users of the api a sense of familiarity.

I suspect this is one of those things that's a matter of everyone's individual preferences; both styles have their merits!

limira commented 6 years ago

@davidhewitt, yeah, because I don't want to stay close to HTML hence I gave up the idea more easily. If you want to stick with HTML, in a .rs file, (along with the highlighting) you should consider about auto close tag. I mean when users type <div> then </div> should be added automatically for the user to feel it's home.

pepsighan commented 6 years ago

@limira As @davidhewitt has said, html! macro will try to keep the syntax as close to HTML as possible for familiarity reasons.