Closed ufobat closed 5 years ago
I agree. Please. Also having to do stuff in a repo is a PITA, a wiki is a more suitable place.
El lun., 28 ene. 2019 a las 10:03, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (< notifications@github.com>) escribió:
I agree. Please. Also having to do stuff in a repo is a PITA, a wiki is a more suitable place.
You can comment, as you are doing now, in a repo. You can assign issues, and close them from commits. You can't do all that with a wiki. Only advantage in a wiki is that anyone can edit it, but you can also do that here via a pull request.
I can flesh out the ideas and assign a suitable mentor, no problem at all with that.
Only advantage in a wiki
Wikis encourage microcontributions. There are many advantages that come from that.
Except when you have to flesh them out to actually publish them, as is needed for the proposal. I'll open an issue for that kind of things, anyway. Better than a wiki for discussion, or requests for clarification.
Then maybe proposal should be filed as an issue originally, and then committed when they're fully ready.
That's another idea. I'll add it to #8
For examlpe me TLS proposal is more or less a rough idea, I am not able to mentor it.
I would be unhappy if we had to delete it because it is (maybe still) a valid idea. Maybe someone could pick up an incomplete proposal and mentor it.