🌟 Community Feature Challenge: Software Development Lifecycle 🌟

[gemanor]

Need some new way to integrate authorization with your SDLC? Do you feel like you can have better CI/CD for fine-grained authorization? This is one of our 10 community feature challenges, and we want your input on how we can enhance the Permit CLI in the area of Software Development Lifecycle and Authorization. This is a space for you to share your ideas on what would make this part of the CLI even better!

How to Participate

• Submit Your Proposal: Comment below with your detailed feature idea. Be sure to explain how it would work and why it would be valuable for users.
• Vote for Your Favorites: Show support for your favorite ideas by upvoting them. Your votes will help us identify the most impactful proposals.
• Win a Bounty: The idea with the most upvotes will be selected, and we’ll put a bounty on it! This means that you (or another contributor) could bring this feature to life and earn a reward.

Why Join In?

• Shape the Future: Your input will directly influence Permit CLI’s growth.
• Community Recognition: Contributing ideas or supporting others’ ideas lets you stand out as a valuable community member.
• Collaborative Ownership: Together, we’ll build a CLI that truly reflects the community’s needs and creativity.

What’s Next?

We’ll keep this challenge open for proposals and upvotes until November 10th, 2024. Once the top idea is chosen, we’ll update this issue with details on the bounty and the next steps for development.

Thank you for helping us make the Permit CLI even better. We can’t wait to see what you come up with! 🌟

[gemanor]

/bounty 200

[algora-pbc[bot]]

💎 $200 bounty • gemanor

💎 $200 bounty • Permit.io

Steps to solve:

1. Start working: Comment /attempt #4 with your implementation plan
2. Submit work: Create a pull request including /claim #4 in the PR body to claim the bounty
3. Receive payment: 100% of the bounty is received 2-5 days post-reward. Make sure you are eligible for payouts

Thank you for contributing to permitio/permit-cli!

Add a bounty • Share on socials

Attempt	Started (GMT+0)	Solution
🔴 @Harsh9485	Oct 30, 2024, 4:37:42 AM	WIP
🟢 @bhavuk2002	Nov 6, 2024, 11:00:57 AM	WIP

[lota02]

/attempt #4 Proposal: CI/CD Integration for Fine-Grained Authorization Policies Description: Develop a CI/CD integration feature within the Permit CLI that automates the deployment and testing of fine-grained authorization policies during the software development lifecycle.

How It Works:

• Automated Policy Deployment: Introduce a command like permit deploy that integrates with CI/CD pipelines (e.g., GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) to automatically deploy updated authorization policies to the desired environment.
• Policy Testing Suite: Implement a command (permit test ) that runs automated tests on the policies, validating that they behave as expected in various scenarios. This ensures policies are rigorously tested before deployment.
• Webhook Support: Allow users to configure webhooks that trigger policy validation and deployment processes upon code changes, ensuring policies are always in sync with the application code.

BENEFITS This enhancement streamlines the integration of authorization into the SDLC, reducing manual effort and potential errors. It enables teams to adopt fine-grained authorization practices efficiently, enhancing security while maintaining agility in development.

[algora-pbc[bot]]

@lota02: We appreciate your enthusiasm but since you already have 3 active bounty attempts, we're going to keep this open for other contributors to attempt. 🫡

[Harsh9485]

/attempt #4

Options

• Cancel my attempt

[ayewo]

Hi @gemanor

I have a couple of questions.

1. I'm curious as to why you created 4 issues for the Community Feature Challenge instead of a single issue? I imagine it would be easier to see proposals and upvotes in one place as they roll in until November 10th, 2024 rather than in 4 places.

2. I'm guessing each proposal will be different i.e. some proposals will be easier to implement than others but I see a flat bounty amount for all for issues. Is this intentional cap on the bounty, or more of a placeholder?

3. To be clear, the bounty amount listed here is for the implementation? Contributors that suggest proposals will only be given "Community Recognition", correct? They will only eligible to be paid the bounty if they also dive in to implement the winning PR?

4. It seems there is an Algora bug on this issue where a total of $400 is on offer, instead of $200, as seen in the screenshot below.

   

[bhavuk2002]

/attempt #4

Feature Proposal: "Automated Policy Validation and CI/CD Integration for Fine-Grained Authorization"

---

How it would work:

1. Pre-commit Hook for Policy Validation:

   • Allow developers to run an authorization policy validation script as part of a pre-commit hook. This script would validate that any changes to the code or the authorization policies (e.g., role definitions, access control rules, permission updates) are correctly implemented and do not conflict with existing policies.
   • The validation could include checks such as:
     • Ensuring that a role does not accidentally gain broader permissions than intended.
     • Checking for unused roles or permissions that might create vulnerabilities.
     • Verifying that sensitive resources are not exposed to unauthorized users.

2. CI/CD Pipeline Integration for Fine-Grained Access Control Testing:

   • Integrate a dedicated step in the CI/CD pipeline to execute tests that simulate how authorization policies will behave in the deployed environment. This step would involve running the application with test data and validating the security of the access control mechanisms.
   • For example, using a framework like Permit’s authorization policies, the pipeline could:
     • Automatically generate authorization tests for specific routes, APIs, or resources to ensure they respect the intended permissions.
     • Perform security scans to check for accidental privilege escalation.

3. Dynamic Policy Monitoring and Alerts:

   • Introduce a dynamic monitoring system that can alert developers when a change in the codebase or policy file affects an existing access control rule. This could be particularly helpful for fast-moving teams to ensure that changes do not unintentionally break security expectations.
   • Example: If a new feature introduces an API endpoint that could be accessed by a broader set of users, the system would flag this as a potential security risk and suggest a review of the permission set before deployment.

4. Integrate with Testing Frameworks (e.g., Jest, Mocha, Cypress):

   • Allow developers to write automated tests for their authorization policies that can be run in their testing framework of choice.
   • For example, developers could use an API mock framework (e.g., Jest or Mocha) to simulate API calls and confirm that permissions are being enforced correctly on the server-side and the client-side.

---

Implementation Roadmap:

1. Start with a Policy Validation Tool: Develop a simple tool that reads the authorization policies from the codebase (e.g., YAML, JSON, etc.) and validates them against a set of rules.
2. Pre-commit Hook Integration: Create a CLI command that hooks into Git to allow developers to validate policies before committing their code.
3. CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Create configurations for popular CI/CD tools like GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins, which run the authorization tests in automated workflows.
4. Develop Test Frameworks: Build compatibility with testing frameworks, allowing developers to write and run tests specific to authorization logic.
5. Introduce Dynamic Monitoring: Provide an optional feature for live monitoring and alerts on policy changes as part of continuous integration.

---

Why would it be valuable:

• Early Authorization Issue Detection: By incorporating fine-grained authorization checks straight into the SDLC, developers can identify authorization problems early on, which lowers the possibility that security flaws will be introduced later on.

• Streamlined Development and Security Collaboration: Developers and security teams can collaborate more effectively by integrating automated checks and validation into the CI/CD pipeline. This ensures that security issues are addressed concurrently with functional development.

• Increased Developer Trust: Developers can concentrate on creating features with automated validation, knowing that any access control problems will be identified before the code is put into production.

• Enhanced Uniformity Among Environments: CI/CD integration guarantees that fine-grained authorization policies are validated uniformly throughout development, staging, and production environments, avoiding inconsistencies and misconfigurations that may occur from manual checks.

---

Outcome: By introducing these automatic validation checks and CI/CD integration for authorization, developers will have a more seamless and secure workflow, minimizing the risk of security flaws creeping into production. This will ensure that the system respects fine-grained access control throughout the lifecycle of development, testing, and deployment.

Options

• Cancel my attempt

[gemanor]

1. I'm curious as to why you created 4 issues for the Community Feature Challenge instead of a single issue? I imagine it would be easier to see proposals and upvotes in one place as they roll in until November 10th, 2024 rather than in 4 places.

We tried to have each issue in a different category. This is why we created multiple bounties.

2. I'm guessing each proposal will be different i.e. some proposals will be easier to implement than others but I see a flat bounty amount for all for issues. Is this intentional cap on the bounty, or more of a placeholder?

Since the submitter and the solver would be the same person, we measure it by relevancy to the community. If someone feels their offer is too big/small for $200, they can break it to smaller content pieces.

3. To be clear, the bounty amount listed here is for the implementation? Contributors that suggest proposals will only be given "Community Recognition", correct? They will only eligible to be paid the bounty if they also dive in to implement the winning PR?

Yeah, bounty is for implementation

4. It seems there is an Algora bug on this issue where a total of $400 is on offer, instead of $200, as seen in the screenshot below.

It is a bug indeed

[gemanor]

For this one, we will go with @lota02 proposal, since @bhavuk2002 shows some gap in understanding the way Permit.io works.

@lota - please share here your plan and detailed implementation, so I can assign you to the issue.