Decide on ePortfolio data model

[balmas]

We need to evaluate existing ePortfolio standards and decide which one we want to use.

[balmas]

As far as I know, the two main standards to consider here are still

1. IMS Global ePortfolio specification
2. Leap 2A

[balmas]

The following needs to be done here

• [ ] research whether there are any additional standards we ought to consider (and whether either of the two mentioned above are clearly no longer relevant)
• [ ] review the data/publication types:
  • [ ] transcription
  • [ ] translation
  • [ ] commentary
  • [ ] imported annotations (e.g. timemapper or hypothes.is annotations)
  • [ ] CTS text annotations
  • [ ] treebank
  • [ ] translation alignment
• [ ] review the sample disseminations
• [ ] review the approval workflows
• [ ] review the git commit logs from data that is in each of the possible various states in the system (new, editing, submitted, committed and archived)
• [ ] manually model the above information in the candidate ePortfolio standard(s)
• [ ] identify the system requirements for automatically producing a dissemination adhering to the manually modeled output

[balmas]

This is done. See https://github.com/perseids-project/eportfolio-specs . Now we just need to implement ....