Closed philbarker closed 10 months ago
Problems with this mapping
Other First Name
are not in the draftNeed to decide:
If CEDS resolves their issue, I say stay with them. If not feel free to change.
compositeName is a legacy field, not widely used. Probably doesn't matter much.
displayName would be more useful (optional). Could use full name from CEDS.
Ought to take this higher before implementing.
Keep compositeName for now, as pesc: property.
Probably ought to expand enumeration to include things like preferredName.
We already use
ceds:hasOtherPersonName
andceds:hasPersonName
as direct equivalents of PESC terms.The CEDS draft ontology uses two different classes for objects of these properties, PersonName and PersonOtherName, with a set subtype of PersonOtherName.
@type
(?)For compositeName we could either: