Closed pesser closed 4 years ago
I would say, for now we are happy without fastnumbers
as this bug has been encountered by quite a few people (@hperrot , @mritv, Richard). The reason for choosing fast_int
was that we omit the less efficient try
-except
statement (see the image). fast_int
is roughly 8 times faster but on a timescale of nano seconds. Thus we should try to get fast_int
working again, but for now not using it is the fine and allows people to use edflow.
are we happy without fastnumbers? #235 @jhaux can you say something? iirc you introduced it in the first place