Open simondean opened 11 years ago
There is definitely a LOT of inconsistency in the naming.
I think the lower case "cuketree" would be more common across the community. I quite like the extra dotted suffix, would "default.cuketree.js" be any better? Or was it actually the extra suffix itself that is causing the issue?
Grunt has a Gruntfile.js . Rake has a Rakefile. Bundler has a Gemfile. A Cuketreefile.js could make sense. Maybe Cuketreefile_ide.js for extra config files?
On 30 Jul 2013, at 18:01, "Pete Clark" notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
There is definitely a LOT of inconsistency in the naming.
I think the lower case "cuketree" would be more common across the community. I quite like the extra dotted suffix, would "default.cuketree.js" be any better? Or was it actually the extra suffix itself that is causing the issue?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/peteclark82/cuke-tree/issues/7#issuecomment-21804961.
The module is called cuke-tree, the binary is called cuketree and the default name of the config file is default.cukeTree.js. What are the thoughts on calling the default config file name: CukeTreefile.js or Cuketreefile.js ?