Closed Ao99 closed 4 years ago
I agree with @Ao99.
I think the real issue is not the abstract of the problem description (it seems like a good overview of what Lattice Boltzmann solvers do), but with the discussion of some of the variabilities this early.
I've highlighted what I think are the "problem sentences"; if they are removed I think this section will read more appropriately.
thank you, updated
I agree with this suggestion. The CA was updated in e291ad6296946a877c21844db772b6e33ebb0dd3 .
I feel that section 5.1 might need to be more abstract. Since it is an overview, do you think it can be more general and with fewer details here?