I know there have been a fair few pull requests and issues logged for changing the logger module to the ulogging module. I doubt that is needed for the majority of users. However, it would be nice if the dprint played a bit nicer with the logging module.
This PR slightly changes the usage of .dprint() to act similar to the ulogging module format.
I know there have been a fair few pull requests and issues logged for changing the logger module to the ulogging module. I doubt that is needed for the majority of users. However, it would be nice if the dprint played a bit nicer with the logging module.
This PR slightly changes the usage of
.dprint()
to act similar to the ulogging module format.