Open peterjc opened 3 years ago
The context is different (metagenomes rather than markers), but another example with shuffled sequences as negative controls:
Lindgreen et al. (2016) An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19233
Also this fungal paper, they made 12 synthetic ITS1 like sequences for use in a mock community:
Palmer et al. (2018) Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4925
They made some similar conclusions:
While the data presented here do not support using read abundance as a proxy for biological abundance in HTAS studies, it does support use of presence/absence (binary) metrics ...
Meta-issue for things we should probably cite in our write-up
Has a nice tables of studies and their controls, lots took the "Set as background level" route we use with negative controls raising our minimum abundance threshold.
See also #318