Closed EmanuelFaria closed 4 years ago
Proposed: A mechanism to distinguish and lable Activities Synergistic or Antagonistic to each other, which we may then relate Essential Oils (ie. organic chemical mixtures) and/or their individual compounds to those activities.
Desired Result: A useful way to search for EOs by selecting all the the activities I want, and automatically be proposed a list of incompatible EOs that also exhibit activities I don't want.
Examples: (I imagine this as a table with two columns
Note that #2 would in most cases be considered a "Bad" (possibly) synergistic duo, unless, for example, you were seeking to test substances that created maximum inflammation. (I pity the poor lab animal).
Personal note: I dream of having this capability make selecting ingredients easier for me, but I can't get a grip on whether such categorization is actually possible. If one of you tells me it's impossible (or even overly impractical), at least I can get this out of my head.
EDIT: Perhaps some of this could be resolved by linking these activities to separate dictionaries for things like (In the case of the pathogenesis of Inflammation):
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:19 PM Emanuel Faria notifications@github.com wrote:
Proposed: A mechanism to distinguish and lable Activities Synergistic or Antagonistic to each other, which we may then relate Essential Oils (ie. organic chemical mixtures) and/or their individual compounds to those activities.
I don't see any papers reporting synergism.
Desired Result: A useful way to search for EOs by selecting all the the activities I want, and automatically be proposed a list of incompatible EOs that also exhibit activities I don't want.
Examples: (I imagine this as a table with two columns
- Clearly Antagonistic Activities: Irritant vs Anti-irritant (or other synonyms like Counter-irritant)
- Possibly Synergistic Activities: Dermatitigenic and Pro-inflammatory
Note that #2 https://github.com/petermr/CEVOpen/issues/2 would in most cases be considered a "Bad" (possibly) synergistic duo, unless, for example, you were seeking to test substances that created maximum inflammation. (I pity the poor lab animal).
Personal note: I dream of having this capability make selecting ingredients easier for me, but I can't get a grip on whether such categorization is actually possible. If one of you tells me it's impossible (or even overly impractical), at least I can get this out of my head.
This is beyond the scope of the papers we have selected I suspect. We cannot get more out f the papers than they contain. This is not a wide-ranging knowledgebase
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/petermr/CEVOpen/issues/43?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFTCSYEN3Q52KBWOKGZ3NTQQMTANA5CNFSM4JFFWAUKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECI72JY#issuecomment-546438439, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFTCS6JRANICNEMVAP5XLTQQMTANANCNFSM4JFFWAUA .
-- "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".
Peter Murray-Rust Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
A place to propose/debate ideas for future features (or at least get them out of our head). ;)