Closed nicopap closed 2 years ago
Thanks. Can you please add some tests for this function?
Thank for the review! Very important to keep thing names consistent in documentation. I indeed picked up "element" by just looking at the iterator methods. I'll fix that.
A question: the docs use both "enabled/disabled" and "set/unset" for value = 1/0. You seem to prefer "set/unset", and I'll follow this preference, but I prefer "enabled/disabled" since "set" can also mean a set of values.
I'm very happy with the second pass on the docs. Although, in insight, I'm a bit skittish about both updating the doc on is_empty
and len
and adding is_clear
.
"enabled/disabled" is ok. Using "bit" instead of element is more important.
Don't worry about updating the doc on is_empty
and len
.
Thank you for the directions and the merge! Was the doc example code enough test?
When using this library, the intent of checking if all elements in a bitset are disabled is better expressed with a specialized method. I doubt it's particularly more performant than
bitset.count_ones(..) == 0
, but when reading code usingFixedBitSet
, it's easier to understand what is going on with abitset.is_clear()
than abitset.count_ones(..) == 0
.I also added docs so that it's less easy to get confused as to what "empty" means (I think the confusion was raised multiple times in the past)