Closed borissavelev closed 1 year ago
It doesn't add any dependency and it looks good enough.
For discoverability, it would be better if TiDB had its own provider - that said, I'm fine with merging the change you're suggesting as long as it fulfills quality standards (tests, docs).
It's not an issue but I'd like to have a consultation before writing code) There is a TiDB which is 99% compatible with MySQL. TiDB has extension to manage configuration dynamicaly https://docs.pingcap.com/tidb/stable/dynamic-config the same way as global variables (with SQL)
What do you think about having another resource type
mysql_tidb_config
with semanticand example usage like: