Currently in RAML 1.0 RC1, it is fully valid to declare a pattern property whose regex will match on an existing property name. For example:
Person:
properties:
a: string
[a] : number
This definition is illegal because property with name 'a' will be matched both to normal property and to a pattern property. RC2 should clearly state that this situations are not valid to avoid these conflicts.
VasiliyLysokobylko
commented
8 years ago
Currently in RAML 1.0 RC1, it is fully valid to declare a pattern property whose regex will match on an existing property name. For example:
This definition is illegal because property with name 'a' will be matched both to normal property and to a pattern property. RC2 should clearly state that this situations are not valid to avoid these conflicts.