In RAML 1.0 RC, the describedBy property of a security scheme has two additional properties description and displayName. My question is if we really need them to be there? A specific security scheme already has a description property and, IMHO, that makes the one in describedBy redundant. I also would understand if we move displayName up to the security scheme property as well, but it should not be in describedBy.
In RAML 1.0 RC, the
describedBy
property of a security scheme has two additional propertiesdescription
anddisplayName
. My question is if we really need them to be there? A specific security scheme already has adescription
property and, IMHO, that makes the one indescribedBy
redundant. I also would understand if we movedisplayName
up to the security scheme property as well, but it should not be indescribedBy
.Happy to hear other opinions.