Reading through the RAML 1.0 spec and comparing that to the previous version I wonder why RAML 1.0 allows to have displayName on the API root level now? I believe in 0.8 its been only used to give a "friendly" name to resources, but I don't understand why we should do the same on the API root level since we have title already.
Reading through the RAML 1.0 spec and comparing that to the previous version I wonder why RAML 1.0 allows to have
displayName
on the API root level now? I believe in 0.8 its been only used to give a "friendly" name to resources, but I don't understand why we should do the same on the API root level since we havetitle
already.