Currently, RC1 does not describe any standard notation for the first line of any RAML file (being the main API or any fragment). Let's add the following to illustrate that in a bit more details:
The first line of a RAML specification compliant document MUST match the IETF RFC5234 – Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications:
Currently, RC1 does not describe any standard notation for the first line of any RAML file (being the main API or any fragment). Let's add the following to illustrate that in a bit more details:
The first line of a RAML specification compliant document MUST match the IETF RFC5234 – Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications:
“#%RAML” SP “1.0” SP [FragmentType] CRLF