Closed jsirois closed 3 months ago
For the #157 OP case of running a PEX pex with no args:
And the more general case of a normal PEX repl built via:
:; pex --interpreter-constraint ">=3.8" --pip-version latest requests --sh-boot -orequests.pex
Reviewers, another big one - but broken up into its bits anyhow. Thanks in advance.
This will probably be the last of these. It's not clear to me review makes much sense anymore except when I actually have questions you might help answer. I don't really like lobbing these things at you guys and I'm sure you don't enjoy being lobbed at.
Reviewers, another big one - but broken up into its bits anyhow. Thanks in advance.
This will probably be the last of these. It's not clear to me review makes much sense anymore except when I actually have questions you might help answer. I don't really like lobbing these things at you guys and I'm sure you don't enjoy being lobbed at.
I am happy to do any code reviews that are actually useful to you! Or when you think it might improve something. But just rubber-stamping makes little sense, I agree.
It should now be clear when you've dropped into a PEX repl (vs. a plain Python repl). This may help stem some of the confusion brough about by running
pex
with no arguments. In addition, you gain some introspection capabilities via thepex_info
REPL command.Fixes #157