Closed alakra closed 5 years ago
👍
@anthonyfalzetti, i'm disappointed this was merged without more discussion.
@pezra sorry I thought this was straightforward and I checked that it wasn't being used in other parts of the code. Next time I will wait for discussion before merging in.
@pezra Let's discuss. Things can be reverted if this does not align with your vision.
Not sure I have a vision for this. 🙂 It just seems a little... arbitrary?
Should exhal have a release task at all? If it should, why is distillery's release task higher in the pecking order (ie, why not rename distillery created task)?
We should document the release process, regardless.
Don't revert this. It's definitely good enough to stay in. I just want to sure I'm following along.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019, 1:01 PM Angelo Lakra notifications@github.com wrote:
@pezra https://github.com/pezra Let's discuss. Things can be reverted if this does not align with your vision.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pezra/exhal/pull/70#issuecomment-485932895, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAABAGRPLP5XUJUE2R2EVQDPR5MIPANCNFSM4HH4CUPQ .
Summary
Depending on the order of dependency compilation in downstream elixir apps, this release module clashes with libraries like
distillery
with the mix taskmix.release
.Potential Solution
In this PR, I added a
ExHal
into the namespace to show that it was specific to this library.