AF Disability SADD

[drfaustusfade]

There is a requirement for this year in AF to have population disaggregated by disability. As disabled bgmw fields would be the same as bgmw, former bgmw fields can be controlled with the same config for bgmw but conditional per country; as alternative categories could be added to the delivery type boys_disabled Disabled Boys girls_disabled Disabled Girls men_disabled Disabled Men women_disabled Disabled Women elderly_men_disabled Disabled Elderly Men elderly_women_disabled Disabled Elderly Women

[fakhrihawari]

Link PR: https://github.com/pfitzpaddy/ngm-reportEngine/pull/172 https://github.com/pfitzpaddy/ngm-reportHub/pull/378

[pfitzpaddy]

I would prefer if we do not add additional columns for disabled. We should add them as;

• delivery type "New Beneficiaries, New Beneficiaries (Disabled), etc)
• or by using the beneficiary_category_type_id that was introduced for Colombia.

The only issue for using beneficiary_category_type_id is how to make a "woke" term for not disabled.... "Disabled" and "Not Disabled"? Another long shot is to use activity_type_detail, might not be practical.

[drfaustusfade]

I would prefer if we do not add additional columns for disabled. We should add them as;

• delivery type "New Beneficiaries, New Beneficiaries (Disabled), etc)
• or by using the beneficiary_category_type_id that was introduced for Colombia.

The only issue for using beneficiary_category_type_id is how to make a "woke" term for not disabled.... "Disabled" and "Not Disabled"? Another long shot is to use activity_type_detail, might not be practical.

1 I would prefer if we do not add additional columns for disabled. Agree, the general notion is to put more prominence on the disabled group, as highlighted for 2020 HRP

2 New Beneficiaries, New Beneficiaries (Disabled) is exactly what we consider as an alternative option

3 _Another long shot is to use activity_type_detail, might not be practical._ That's the issue as all activities should have it

4 _or by using the beneficiary_category_typeid that was introduced for Colombia. exactly what we need, thanks for pointing out, I think we could call it General public and Disabled

[drfaustusfade]

@fakhrihawari Please proceed with 4 point

• [x] update beneficiary_category_type_id functionality for AF as per 4 point

[fakhrihawari]

Link PR : https://github.com/pfitzpaddy/ngm-reportHub/pull/379

[pfitzpaddy]

Merged