brianlangseth-NOAA
commented
1 year ago - [x] Figures are in the pre-recruit survey write up. I dont know where those are. Possibly delete in write up or add figures
- [x] Explore sensitivity of excluding 2010, 2012, and 2022 from pre-recruit
- [x] Confirm state length excel sheets match what we have for fishery comps
- [x] Work up and add in the Canadian catches
- [x] Add in write up for canadian waters
- [ ] Try sensitivity with triennial index from previous model, which was an ECE index
- [x] Expand com comps with new PacFIN utilities that accounts for no sample weight samples. Would increase expansion_factor2 above 1 I did this and compared the comps. Found limited differences 1-5% changes in proportions. Largest were for CA NTWL for sex = 3 of around 15% but these are from very few samples with limited bins, so overall change in model results is expected to be minimal - running the model confirms no effect*
- [x] Check a few other options for set up for prerecruit survey (treat as measure of spawning stock biomass or recruitment)
As we go through writing or thinking, here is a single place for dumping tasks, ideas, or remaining items we need to come back to. It is not meant to be exhaustive nor persprictive but gives a single place on things to update.
Just edit a comment to add more things so as to minimize the number of comments.