Added some minor edits within the north document (doc files) that I noticed when reading before the review. These were added in 68d8921
A few I wasn't able to resolve
[x] In section 1.5.1 was confusing whether the "respectively" was in relation to north and south, or fixed gear and open access.
[x] In section 2.1.1.3 was confusing whether the "respectively" was in relation to Washington and Oregon, or California (in 1995) and Washington and Oregon (in 1987)
[x] Figure 11 "Comparison of recreational landings from this assessment....". It would be helpful to specify here that catch from California is aggregated across regions (north and south).
A few I note below because I wasn't entirely confident of the outcome of my edit
[x] I excluded the text for the deb wilson-vandenberg in the north write up (section 2.1.4.8). The California onboard observer index may also be one to exclude for the north write up (section 2.1.4.7) though I wasn't sure so did not do so.
Added some minor edits within the north document (doc files) that I noticed when reading before the review. These were added in 68d8921
A few I wasn't able to resolve
A few I note below because I wasn't entirely confident of the outcome of my edit