Open pfstrack opened 1 year ago
Just collecting all the relevant forms I know of for reference here:
Plurals with -in: No epenthetic o develops, instead the suffix -in is used, either in analogy to êl → elin or from primitive -ī·m.
Plurals with -il: The word is regularly mutated before an epenthetic vowel develops, then an i is inserted instead of o:
Plurals with -i: No epenthetic vowel develops, instead an i is appended. Final vowels are rather unusual for Sindarin; the line “from lī, lya. ?ḷ́ > li, ṛ́ > ri*” (PE17/419) might have been meant to explain this condition. The rest of the word is mutated.
Those forms always appear next to egil and ygil respectively, so they might have been meant to be intermediate explanatory forms, rather than modern Sindarin plurals.
Analogical formations. The word is mutated as if it had no special history:
Forms in -ir, see below as well:
Apparently primarily for people.
Perhaps this is connected to the class plural in -lir:
This might be a restoration of a ᴱN. pattern:
and also for adjectives:
— Gilruin
Also signs of -ir plurals in pronouns: https://eldamo.org/content/words/word-1090138655.html
Also, on an inserted slip in the Etymologies, VT46/29, struck out:
eme many: -m plural Telerin pl am, um, em. edulam. ī̆-me, mē̆i. ON -ī̆me as gondoimē. hence general N [pl.] -im [deleted goð] goloðuim
As seen in PE17/139-142