search

pgRouting / admin

Cross-project tasks and organizational items
1 stars 0 forks source link

Adopting RFC2 #22

Closed cvvergara closed 5 years ago

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

Change from "waiting for feedback" to "adopted"

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

@dkastl Which linter do you use?

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

@woodbri The idea is to have planned releases The latest releases of pgRouting have being done on march and september This RFC only covers up to pgRouting version 5 which is on september 2023.

What we want to avoid is the "dynamic" unplanned because of lack of plans it might happen again what happened from the 2.0.0 release on September 2013, the next one v2.1.0 was done on September 2015, 2 years after.

The last years since v2.1.0 up to the current one releases have being done on march and september This RFC just makes it official whats being happening in pgRouting

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

The road map that we can make it can just cover up to the next major release

dkastl commented 5 years ago

I agree with Steve, that we may want to move the "Roadmap" to some other place.

I like to have a yearly scheduled plan for releases rather than make this dependent on specific features. Looking at other projects it seems to work better and prevents delay. It also makes it possible to stay in sync with projects like OSGeo Live. Even if there are not many new features in a release, it gives users the feeling, that the project is active.

@cvvergara , I'm using a plugin for VisualCode, that lists possible improvements of the Markdown syntax as "Problems": https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=DavidAnson.vscode-markdownlint and https://github.com/DavidAnson/vscode-markdownlint Not sure, how official this is. If someone knows a better one, let me know!

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

@dkastl @woodbri Can you please re-review, I made clear that that is an example, so I think

woodbri commented 5 years ago

I was suggesting that you move the "Proposed Dates" section into a RoadMap document and reference the Roadmap where the "Proposed Dates" section is (via a link or comment). This will separate process, ie: RFC2 from project activity, ie: the RoadMap. Otherwise, everything else looks great. Nice job!

cvvergara commented 5 years ago

Well, now that is an example, I can make the link once the Road Map is created. But there is no rad map yet, this is needed to create it