Closed krashish8 closed 1 year ago
I have some queries, as I'm updating these Docker images for the first time:
There can be a lot of combinations possible with different pgrouting, postgis, and PostgreSQL versions. Do we update for all such combinations? (I saw that we update only the latest ones, e.g. pgrouting 3.1.3 is present but 3.1.2 is absent)
Do we check whether the docker images are correct or not? If yes, how? I don't see any CI builds/checks present here.
I have renamed master to main, and updated the osm2pgrouting version. So, in Dockerhub: all the Docker images need to be updated (because of osm2pgrouting) and the Docker images named "master" need to be deleted, right? (to create the new images named "main")
Maybe we should stop publishing the images for very older versions of pgrouting and PostgreSQL?
Please review, and do suggest if some changes are required.
I see that you are also changing version 2.x on osm2pgrouting.
We are no longer supporting 2.x I think: do not encourage users to use 2.x
marked as draft after #50 is resolved
Q: Why are we having different docker images for different pgRouting patch releases?
Maybe we can have a single image 12-3.1-3.2
containing the latest patch release 3.2.2, instead of several images 12-3.1-3.2.0
, 12-3.1-3.2.1
, etc because anyway, users would want to use the latest patch release.
@krashish8 sounds reasonable, open an issue with that information.
Why can't Docker pull 13-3.1-3.2.1 ?
@irwin-uc This is just a draft PR, probably won't merge now, need to make some changes. Actually, we want to have a single docker image for a minor release rather than several docker images per patch release because anyway, users would want to use the latest patch version. (older patch version might have bugs which is fixed in later patch version)
Refer: https://github.com/pgRouting/docker-pgrouting/issues/53
Closing because of #55
Changes proposed in this pull request:
@pgRouting/admins