You're probably familiar with this issue already, but if you're not, here's the tl;dr - the master branch was derived from the master/slave analogy and using the term in a casual context is becoming a bit dated.
Speaking for myself here and not the city-scrapers project, the debate could be summarized as a case of intent versus impact. On the one hand master just means "the main copy" in the engineering world, and changing the name of a branch might be more symbolic than substantive. On the other hand this is an easy one-time fix and there's no real upside to keeping master. On balance, I know we have attempted to diversify our volunteers throughout this project, we still have work to do there, and changing master to main would help send a friendly message to anyone and everyone interested in contributing.
Here's a nice guide to all the steps we would need to perform. Let me know your thoughts.
You're probably familiar with this issue already, but if you're not, here's the tl;dr - the
master
branch was derived from the master/slave analogy and using the term in a casual context is becoming a bit dated.Speaking for myself here and not the city-scrapers project, the debate could be summarized as a case of intent versus impact. On the one hand
master
just means "the main copy" in the engineering world, and changing the name of a branch might be more symbolic than substantive. On the other hand this is an easy one-time fix and there's no real upside to keepingmaster
. On balance, I know we have attempted to diversify our volunteers throughout this project, we still have work to do there, and changingmaster
tomain
would help send a friendly message to anyone and everyone interested in contributing.Here's a nice guide to all the steps we would need to perform. Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Ben