Closed pvorb closed 12 years ago
You are free to fork away. Nowadays I'd take a completely different path to this anyway :)
No dia 04/02/2012, às 20:13, Paul Vorbach reply@reply.github.com escreveu:
I think this project is dead. What about continuing it on our own?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pgte/alfred/issues/18
Yes, from the little I saw, I think it should be rewritten. But something like that takes time...
I still think we need a in-process db.
Yes we do, but I'd do it using a leveldb binding and build from there.
On Feb 4, 2012, at 8:41 PM, "Sérgio Ramos" reply@reply.github.com wrote:
Yes, from the little I saw, I think it should be rewritten. But something like that takes time...
I still think we need a in-process db.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pgte/alfred/issues/18#issuecomment-3813157
Have there been any problems, that you couldn't solve with plain JavaScript objects or what are the reasons why you recommend a binding? Wouldn't it be cleaner to build it entirely in JavaScript without any dependencies? Otherwise you could also use redis/mongodb/couchdb/…
Redis/mongodb/couchdb are all services that are out of process. Leveldb is an embeddable db engine that is battle-hardened. If anyone is to take a proj like this seriously and not treat it like another experiment on node, it has to be based on something ppl trust. Ppl take their data seriously...
No dia 05/02/2012, às 00:12, Paul Vorbach reply@reply.github.com escreveu:
Have there been any problems, that you couldn't solve with plain JavaScript objects or what are the reasons why you recommend a binding? Wouldn't it be cleaner to build it entirely in JavaScript without any dependencies. Otherwise you could also use redis/mongodb/couchdb/…
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pgte/alfred/issues/18#issuecomment-3814478
That's not an easy decision. I don't think that I am the right person for this, because I'm not that experienced in C++.
Maybe I'll do some experiments with a plain JS implementation on my own.
Everyone should do that type of experiment, really learned a lot bout node. Anyway there already is a good binding for leveldb somewhere I remember reading.
No dia 05/02/2012, às 12:02, Paul Vorbach reply@reply.github.com escreveu:
That's not an easy decision. I don't think that I am the right person for this, because I'm not that experienced in C++.
Maybe I'll do some experiments with a plain JS implementation on my own.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pgte/alfred/issues/18#issuecomment-3817170
Maybe creationix/node-leveldb?
That one is actually not finished, there's a fork of that one, I'll check when back to pc.
No dia 05/02/2012, às 13:27, Paul Vorbach reply@reply.github.com escreveu:
Maybe creationix/node-leveldb?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pgte/alfred/issues/18#issuecomment-3817596
This one: https://github.com/my8bird/node-leveldb
Well, we choose alfred for one of our project and with some bug fixes it finally start to work stable enough. Though alfred is not ideal it has closest set of functions we looking for in-process key/value store. So will stick on it for some time.
I think this project is dead. What about continuing it on our own?