Open tom114 opened 6 years ago
This is also relevant for issue #211 where assemblies are associated with SequenceFile
(specifically SequencingObject
). Right now, since samples are linked, modifying an assembly for a sample (if that was ever implemented) would lead to the same issue.
Imported from GitLab. Originally posted on 2016/09/27 03:33PM
Probably. The main problem to consider though is that we assume a SequenceFile
comes from a single Sample
. Copying a Sample
will probably mean copying all associated SequenceFile
s (database objects) as well.
Imported from GitLab. Originally posted on 2015/12/15 02:51PM
This is a fine idea to me.
Should we use a terminology change in the UI to explain the difference to the user between copying and linking? "Copy sample to project" and "Link sample to project"?
Imported from GitLab. Originally posted on 2015/12/15 02:27PM Originally posted by Franklin Bristow
Matthew Walker suggested he would like the ability to be able to physically copy samples in the system rather than just linking. The concern is that samples may be linked from project
x
to projecty
, and a manager on projecty
may make changes to the sample (such as deleting files) without knowing it will affect projectx
.Imported from GitLab issue #344. Originally posted on 2015/12/15 01:34PM