Open joostschouppe opened 2 months ago
Thank you for your feedback. Sorry for the inconvenience! We've restored phacochr to its previous version (0.9.14). If you do:
devtools::install_github(‘phacochr/phacochr’)
library(phacochr)
phaco_setup_data()
and optionally:
phaco_best_data_update()
it should work as before.
Also, would you be willing to share your address set with me so that I can try it out (hugo.perilleux@ulb.be)?
Yes, this solves the issue. Here are some test results:
Some Dutch in Brussels, some German in Ostbelgien | Region | n | Valid rue(%) | Rue detect.(%valid) | Approx.(n) | Elarg.(n) | Mid.(n) | Geocode(%valid) | Geocode(%tot) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bruxelles | 26 | 100 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Flandre | 70 | 100 | 97.1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 97.1 | 97.1 | |
Wallonie | 54 | 100 | 90.7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 88.9 | 88.9 | |
NA | 2 | 100 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 152 | 100 | 94.1 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 93.4 | 93.4 |
(here the results were about 50% in Brussels before)
French where available | Region | n | Valid rue(%) | Rue detect.(%valid) | Approx.(n) | Elarg.(n) | Mid.(n) | Geocode(%valid) | Geocode(%tot) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bruxelles | 26 | 100 | 96.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 96.2 | 96.2 | |
Flandre | 70 | 100 | 97.1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 97.1 | 97.1 | |
Wallonie | 54 | 100 | 90.7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 88.9 | 88.9 | |
NA | 2 | 100 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 152 | 100 | 93.4 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 92.8 | 92.8 |
In recent geocoding on data that I geocoded before, I see a regression in quality. It seems to be related to the language of the street name. If you are in Brussels and give a Dutch streetname, or in the German speaking area and give a German street name, the results seem to be a lot worse then when you give a French streetname. This was not an issue a year or so ago. In one dataset, I have Brussels addresses with both the Dutch and the French streetname. They have a 8% success rate in Dutch and 96% success in French.