pharmaR / regulatory-r-repo-wg

Package consensus for regulated industries
https://pharmar.github.io/regulatory-r-repo-wg
27 stars 3 forks source link

Use a Design Thinking approach #32

Open dgkf opened 1 year ago

dgkf commented 1 year ago

Discussed in https://github.com/pharmaR/regulatory-r-repo-wg/discussions/31

Migrated following decision in #20

Originally posted by **pedrobtz** January 10, 2023 I would suggest to use a Design Thinking approach to this topic. I have the impression that we are already between "ideate" and "prototype" phase, and I would be interested in understanding better the "emphasize" and "idealize". ![img](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5d6700e799e03b0001e82f2b/1626883822809-VNM8FIOPSX147NBK8SZ2/DesignThinkingProcessChart.png?format=1500w) #### On Emphasize: - One can collect & document Developers and Regulators feedback, ideas, etc. #### On Idealize: I see (at least) two user stories. 1. As a R developer of mathematical models [or statistical analsysis], for a regulated industry (Pharma, Banking, Insurance, etc.), I would like to be able to better evaluate R package quality. 2. As a company operating in a regulated environment, I would like to setup centrally an (internal or cross-industry) CRAN-like repository such that all R packages [which are used for regulated modelling activities] were (and are regularly) evaluated and guarantee to fulfil pre established quality requirements. ### References: - https://www.designreview.byu.edu/collections/design-thinking-part-1-basic-concepts-and-principles - https://web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf
kkmann commented 1 year ago

can we merge this with #15 somehow ?