Closed narayanan-iyer-pfizer closed 3 months ago
@AARON-CLARK will take a look at tests... And @Jeff-Thompson12 volunteers too!
@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I pushed a couple commits that should help you out with dealing with the errors. It seems like the main issue now is that archive
is returning a different directory tree than what one would expect if the tarball was unpacked. Mainly the difference is that the directory is no longer being returned in alphabetical order which I think we would want.
@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I pushed a couple commits that should help you out with dealing with the errors. It seems like the main issue now is that
archive
is returning a different directory tree than what one would expect if the tarball was unpacked. Mainly the difference is that the directory is no longer being returned in alphabetical order which I think we would want.Thanks ! I have updated code to sort it . Still the tests seems to failing
Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000%
with 9 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 79.34%. Comparing base (
bdcbffc
) to head (b1a618d
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
R/mod_code_explorer.R | 77.14% | 8 Missing :warning: |
R/mod_code_explorer_utils.R | 95.45% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Changes made to address the requests. Tests are still failing , pls take a look.thanks
@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I am getting some console warnings when viewing help documents in the file explorer. Can you take a look?
![]()
this has been addressed in a different way
@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I am getting some console warnings when viewing help documents in the file explorer. Can you take a look?
![]()
this has been addressed in a different way
Marvelous. I love it.
@AARON-CLARK did you want to take a look at this PR? My additions were fairly minor, but since I did contribute, I wasn't sure if you wanted an additional pair of eyes on it.
did you want to take a look at this PR?
Normally, No! I trust you. But I had a minute so I just pulled it open to test anyway (lol). The source explorer is lightning fast now! Great work @narayanan-iyer-pfizer! And thanks @Jeff-Thompson12 for contributing.
By using Archive library, I have refactored the code in code explorer, package explorer to read tarballs in memory