Open LDSamson opened 4 months ago
Yeah, this sounds like we could definitely improve the discoverability here.
We could add some dynamically generated roxygen docs to ?metric_score
like we do for ?pkg_assess
. We already have the description attributes to support {riskassessment}
, so we can probably do something similar here.
Of course, if you think the docs themselves for the specific methods could be improved, then that's always a place where we welcome contributions!
The description of how individual metrics are calculated is hard to find. I had to dive deep into the source code of the package to, for example, find how the score for 'package metric dependencies' is calculated. Is there any documentation that I did not find yet about this topic?
Maybe the standard scores can be included in a vignette, including the calculation method and rationale? That would be really helpful.