Closed bundfussr closed 10 months ago
Hey @bundfussr I was going to start asking around for someone to work on this issue?
I see you are not at backlog meeting next week. Maybe we could spend some time on Wednesday meeting giving more context to this issue?
I think the first question I have: is this intended to be a new function or an enhancement to derive_var_merged_exist_flag()
the language is confusing to me in the issue.
I'm leaning towards a new function as current function has 9 arguments and is easy to understand from my perspective - adding in more args and documentation might be very confusing for users
is this intended to be a new function or an enhancement to
derive_var_merged_exist_flag()
Definitely a new function.
Proposal for new function name: derive_var_merged_ms_exist_flag
where ms
is multiple sources?
Proposal for new function name:
derive_var_merged_ms_exist_flag
wherems
is multiple sources?
I am not sure. I think we need to discuss the naming of the functions in general. I have made a proposal in the admiral Functions review. There I used "multi" for multiple sources. Another option is "msrc".
Feature Idea
Implement a new function similar to
derive_var_merged_exist_flag()
but considering multiple source datasets (for example for the ADJ, ADJAE, and ADJME parameter in ADEX) should be implemented. The function should use source objects and thesource_datasets
argument like inderive_var_dthcaus()
.Relevant Input
No response
Relevant Output
No response
Reproducible Example/Pseudo Code
No response