Open WangLaoK opened 1 month ago
Thank you @WangLaoK for the feedback!
@pharmaverse/admiral is there a way to display more of the rows in the examples?
Thank you @WangLaoK for the feedback!
@pharmaverse/admiral is there a way to display more of the rows in the examples?
Would print(dataset, n = 30)
or similar work?
Thank you @WangLaoK for the feedback! @pharmaverse/admiral is there a way to display more of the rows in the examples?
Would
print(dataset, n = 30)
or similar work?
Not sure if we can put LOCF record in the first 12 rows. please check the example in this link. https://pharmaverse.github.io/admiral/reference/derive_locf_records.html
Thank you @WangLaoK for the feedback! @pharmaverse/admiral is there a way to display more of the rows in the examples?
Would
print(dataset, n = 30)
or similar work?Not sure if we can put LOCF record in the first 12 rows. please check the example in this link. https://pharmaverse.github.io/admiral/reference/derive_locf_records.html
{admiral} doesn't sort the output datasets usually. Maybe in the example we would need to combine print(dataset, n = 30)
with a call to dplyr::arrange()
to make the order more intutive.
I would change the subject ids such that the second subject is displayed first and sort the output dataset by USUBJID
, PARAMCD
, and AVISITN
.
Hi @WangLaoK how come you closed this issue? I don't think we actioned it yet. I'm reopening it for now.
Hi @WangLaoK how come you closed this issue? I don't think we actioned it yet. I'm reopening it for now.
Hi @manciniedoardo , sorry for the actions. I thought this query had been aware and solved from a new release.
I will not close issues next time. hope this is fine for you,.
Regards, Hans
@manciniedoardo … what do I need to do finish this? #2461. Thx (also reading a lot re: pharmaverse)
@manciniedoardo … what do I need to do finish this? #2461. Thx (also reading a lot re: pharmaverse)
Will review, thanks for the reminder.
I think now done. And it is better than mine! Still learning
@manciniedoardo
Before I push again to #2475, I want to check this is right path: (intermediate variable X
will NOT be in push)
As written, the example code must display all records to see LOCF
populated in the DTYPE
field.
This might be a simple fix: (variable X
is NOT appear in the push)
#' X= derive_locf_records(
#' dataset = advs,
#' dataset_ref = advs_expected_obsv,
#' by_vars = exprs(STUDYID, USUBJID, PARAMCD),
#' order = exprs(AVISITN, AVISIT),
#' keep_vars = exprs(PARAMN)
#' )
#' X |> print(n=30)
However, If I understand bundfussr's ... suggestion correctly, better to display USUBJID column first, followed by PARAMCD, AVISIT.
But this still requires printing all rows to see LOCF*, as follows:
Proposed code
(X will NOT appear in the push)
#' X |> relocate(USUBJID) |> arrange(USUBJID, PARAMCD, AVISIT) |> print(n=30)
#' X= derive_locf_records(
#' dataset = advs,
#' dataset_ref = advs_expected_obsv,
#' by_vars = exprs(STUDYID, USUBJID, PARAMCD),
#' order = exprs(AVISITN, AVISIT),
#' keep_vars = exprs(PARAMN)
#' )
#' #### X |> print(n=30)
#' X |> relocate(USUBJID) |> arrange(USUBJID, PARAMCD, AVISIT) |> print(n=30)
output from proposed solution
# A tibble: 22 × 8
USUBJID STUDYID PARAMCD PARAMN AVAL AVISITN AVISIT DTYPE
<chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
1 01-701-1015 CDISC01 DIABP 2 51 0 BASELINE NA
2 01-701-1015 CDISC01 DIABP 2 50 2 WEEK 2 NA
3 01-701-1015 CDISC01 DIABP 2 51 4 WEEK 4 NA
4 01-701-1015 CDISC01 DIABP 2 50 6 WEEK 6 NA
5 01-701-1015 CDISC01 PULSE 1 61 0 BASELINE NA
6 01-701-1015 CDISC01 PULSE 1 60 6 WEEK 6 NA
7 01-701-1015 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 121 0 BASELINE NA
8 01-701-1015 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 121 2 WEEK 2 NA
9 01-701-1015 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 121 4 WEEK 4 NA
10 01-701-1015 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 121 6 WEEK 6 NA
11 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 79 0 BASELINE NA
12 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 80 2 WEEK 2 NA
13 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 80 4 WEEK 4 LOCF
14 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 NA 4 WEEK 4 NA
15 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 80 6 WEEK 6 LOCF
16 01-701-1028 CDISC01 DIABP 2 NA 6 WEEK 6 NA
17 01-701-1028 CDISC01 PULSE 1 65 0 BASELINE NA
18 01-701-1028 CDISC01 PULSE 1 65 6 WEEK 6 LOCF
19 01-701-1028 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 130 0 BASELINE NA
20 01-701-1028 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 132 2 WEEK 2 NA
21 01-701-1028 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 132 4 WEEK 4 LOCF
22 01-701-1028 CDISC01 SYSBP 3 132 6 WEEK 6 LOCF
Please select a category the issue is focused on?
Function Documentation
Let us know where something needs a refresh or put your idea here!
> # A tibble: 22 × 8
> STUDYID USUBJID PARAMCD PARAMN AVAL AVISITN AVISIT DTYPE
>
> 1 CDISC01 01-701-1015 DIABP 2 51 0 BASELINE NA
> 2 CDISC01 01-701-1015 DIABP 2 50 2 WEEK 2 NA
> 3 CDISC01 01-701-1015 DIABP 2 51 4 WEEK 4 NA
> 4 CDISC01 01-701-1015 DIABP 2 50 6 WEEK 6 NA
> 5 CDISC01 01-701-1015 PULSE 1 61 0 BASELINE NA
> 6 CDISC01 01-701-1015 PULSE 1 60 6 WEEK 6 NA
> 7 CDISC01 01-701-1015 SYSBP 3 121 0 BASELINE NA
> 8 CDISC01 01-701-1015 SYSBP 3 121 2 WEEK 2 NA
> 9 CDISC01 01-701-1015 SYSBP 3 121 4 WEEK 4 NA
> 10 CDISC01 01-701-1015 SYSBP 3 121 6 WEEK 6 NA
> # ℹ 12 more rows
Should have 12 more rows below, then user can see the LCOF creation there.